Your restaurant has an inspector. Your toaster has one. Your airline has one. Your AI has a press release.
Somewhere in your bank, your hospital or your company’s hiring, an AI system is reading, judging and acting, and the only report on how safely it does that came from the company that sold it. This book is about the one question nobody asks before signing. Who checked?
PDF, 129 pages, 0.9 MB. No email, no form, no strings. Read it, share it, print it.
The file’s SHA-256 fingerprint, so you can check that what you downloaded is what was published:
bfa6aee8a1dbc43dc309148eeea0828f2e7a0419c049d2536d643b594ac20ce3
Every other thing that can hurt you has an outside inspector. The restaurant, the elevator, the airplane, the audited company. AI does not, and the book explains why: for most of this technology’s short life there was nobody else to give the job to, and the arrangement built for the early days is now hardening into the way it is done.
It shows what has already gone wrong when a machine was believed and nobody could check it in time. It walks through what the new rules require and what they miss. And it ends with what four of the most capable AI systems in the world did when they were given a job, an inbox and one fake email. Two of the four wired the money. The money was fake. The decision was real.
What it is not. No model and no company is named as the subject of a finding; the four systems are lettered, the same way the public study letters them. It shows what these failures are and never how to cause them. And it does not ask you to take the author’s word for anything: every finding carries its date, and the record behind it is described on the page.
It is that the chair cannot stay empty. If you already test these systems from the outside, keep the record, and can afford the bad news, you are doing the job the book is about. If you buy the systems, ask who checked, and do not take “we checked ourselves” as the answer.
The second book, The Evidence, is the record behind this one: what was run, against which system, on what date, and how a stranger checks it. Until it appears, the public study is what a stranger can check, and a reviewer can have the full record under the terms of an engagement letter.
When you would rather have a system tested than argued about: the entry screen is published, priced and bought without a sales call, and a real report from it is on this site in full.